Constant Viewer: Traitor and Babylon A.D.

D.A. Ridgely on Aug 30th 2008

Traitor is a slightly better than average suspense thriller with a significantly better than average performance by Don Cheadle in the lead role. Sadly, however, the same cannot be said of his co-star, Guy Pierce, whose American accent isn’t too awful until it is revealed through dialog along the way that he’s supposed to be a Southerner, too. Pierce is a good actor, but we might consider going back to those halcyon days when honest-to-goodness American actors, or at least Canadian ringers, were cast in such roles. Constant Viewer knows all about the wonderfully talented Hugh Laurie in House and all that, but enough is enough.

CV suspects Traitor may slip in and out of your local cineplex before you notice it was there, as it was not produced by one of the major studios and received precious little pre-release advertising. As the contemporary crop of Middle Eastern terrorists versus U.S. intelligence agency films go, Traitor is a perfectly respectable entry. If you like such movies but you waited to see it on DVD, though, you wouldn’t miss much at all.

* * * * * * * * * *

If you waited to see Babylon A.D. on DVD you wouldn’t miss much, either. Then again, that’s equally true if you don’t bother seeing it at all. Vin Diesel turns in an acceptable Vin Diesel performance in this hyperactive but unengaging road movie. The road in question leads from Russia over the Bering Straits, across which Diesel’s character must transport a young woman (Mélanie Thierry) and her governess (Michelle Yeoh) from Mongolia to Manhattan. There are nice performances in comparatively small parts here by Charlotte Rampling and Gérard Depardieu, but the plot is so tissue thin and the directing so uneven and distracting their efforts are largely wasted. As was CV’s time.

Filed in The Bijou

2 Responses to “Constant Viewer: Traitor and Babylon A.D.

  1. Chris Berezon 30 Aug 2008 at 10:07 pm

    When I first saw the trailer for Traitor like a month or so ago, I couldn’t figure out what kind of film it was trying to be? Was it a “stop the Muslim extremist” film? Was it a “this guy is labeled as a Muslim extremist but he’s not really so now he has to prove his innocence” film? Even the trailer was confusing and all across the board. Still, all the same, I was intrigued. But then, around a week ago, I heard Jim Norton of the Opie and Anthony show (who got to see a pre-release screening) say pretty much what you said: In short, that he didn’t hate it; it was just sort of “eh”. I have a feeling that that opinion won’t be in the minority.

    As far as Babylon A.D., I’ve already decided I hate it based on the TV ads alone. But I think CV would be interested to know that the director himself hates his film:

    Mathieu Kassovitz is pissed off. The French auteur, who first made waves in 1995 with La Haine, is supposed to be celebrating the passion project he’s been nursing for the past five years. Instead — the week before Babylon A.D. hits theaters — he is nursing a grudge. “I’m very unhappy with the film,” he says. “I never had a chance to do one scene the way it was written or the way I wanted it to be. The script wasn’t respected. Bad producers, bad partners, it was a terrible experience.”

    The article has even more.

  2. movie buffon 02 Sep 2008 at 6:18 am

    the previews for Babylon AD made me expect something a lot more original… it totally felt like a cross between Minority Report and the Fifth Element

Trackback URI |