Why I Have Not Participated In Any Tax Evader’s Project
Jim Babka on Apr 12th 2008
(by Jim Babka, with tremendous assistance from the late Harry Browne)
Perhaps you’ve been told that you don’t have to pay the Income Tax. I’m sorry to be the one to break the bad news to you, but all of the theories floating around are based on misguided or dangerous interpretations of the income tax rules. And, as I’ll demonstrate later in this article, they’re not the best way to end the Income Tax and win a much smaller, constitutionally limited government.
I’ve been presented with several of these plans over the years by scores of well-meaning, patriotic people. In fact, my friend, the late Harry Browne (whose very words appear throughout this piece), looked at those plans starting back in 1962. Back then he worked professionally promoting the Liberty Amendment – a proposed constitutional amendment that repeals the Sixteenth Amendment (income tax) and restores the Tenth Amendment (limiting federal powers; federalism).
He continued to look at these schemes in the decades that followed. He wouldn’t recommend a single one of them.
Neither would I.
The theories advanced by the proprietors of these schemes usually include one or more of following contentions:
- Congress has never passed a law requiring you to pay taxes;
- The 16th Amendment (authorizing an income tax) was never actually ratified;
- The Internal Revenue Code applies only to corporations, or that it doesn’t apply to wages and salaries, or that it applies only in U.S. possessions like Guam or the Virgin Islands;
- The IRS itself says that paying income tax is voluntary;
- A legal obligation to file a return that could incriminate you violates the 5th Amendment to the Constitution. (It is beyond the scope of this article to examine these claims. However, if you believe there’s no law requiring you to pay income tax, click here. For a more detailed review of various tax-protest plans, click here to read a well-written article by Daniel J. Pilla. Even the IRS itself has addressed the issue directly, contrary to one opinion circulating on the net, click here, and note items #5 and #8.)
It takes a lot of guts to fight the State head-on. If you’re thinking about doing it anyway, there are two things you should be aware of.
People Go to Prison
First, it doesn’t matter whether you believe the income tax is “legal.” Whether or not it is, many people who don’t pay income tax are put in prison.
One of the best-known promoters of these schemes has been in prison three times — each time for tax-related offenses. During his time in prison, he usually figures out what was wrong with his plan — and he comes out with a new, safer way of getting around the system.
Many others who have tried these schemes have paid dearly for it. Some may have made a conscious, patriotic decision to protest the income tax system, aware of the consequences and willing to pay the price. If that was the case, I’d say I admire their bravery and spirit. Unfortunately, most of them went to prison and/or lost their homes because they thought there was a way to evade taxes without danger.
I believe it is irresponsible for someone to encourage other people to take that risk when the person doing the encouraging is not going to suffer their consequences. None of these programs comes with a guarantee to redeem your home when the IRS sells it at auction.
No matter how strong the argument someone makes to claim you don’t have to pay income tax, remember that the question isn’t: Is the logic correct? The question is: Do people go to prison for following it?
Don’t Be Fooled by IRS Inattention
Second, the claims usually are accompanied by stories of people who have followed the recommended procedure for years and have never been bothered by the IRS.
If the Internal Revenue Service is aware that you haven’t paid your taxes for a year or two, it may send you a notice asking whether you’ve filed a return that they missed. If you don’t answer or you tell the IRS you have no legal obligation to pay, and the IRS stops sending you notices, it isn’t because the IRS has given up on you.
Instead, the IRS will give you enough rope to hang yourself. The IRS, like any bureaucracy, moves at a glacial pace. But in this instance, that’s to their advantage, not yours. They’re OK with you going several years without paying tax for two reasons: (1) to establish that it was part of a pattern of deliberate evasion, rather than an isolated mistake; and (2) to allow the unpaid taxes, penalties, and interest to accumulate to a size that makes it worth prosecuting you.
Every one of the you-don’t-have-to-pay-income-tax programs started out with “air tight” arguments that supposedly avoided the pitfalls of all the other you-don’t-have-to-pay-income-tax movements — the “mistaken” ones that had sent people to prison. But, eventually, people do go to prison, and we don’t want you to be one of them.
And it all may be for naught, because promoting such schemes does nothing to show people that we don’t need big government!
I’ve Heard It All Before
No matter how good you think the latest tax evasion plan is, I’ll tell you now that I’m not going to drop what I’m doing to investigate it. And just because I don’t sign up for one of the tax protester programs doesn’t mean I’m going after heated slave quarters, while someone else is pursuing abolition. I’m quite busy doing the things I believe (based on extensive training and experience) will best advance the cause of small, limited government – including ending the income tax. I think it’s fair, in this case, to say that I’ve already done my due diligence on this subject, and now I want to move on with my life to investigate other things that are likely to be more fruitful to me.
How to Get Rid of the Income Tax
We the people will get rid of the income tax only when we show enough Americans that they will be far better off by reducing government dramatically so that they can be entirely free of the Income Tax. In most cases, that should be far easier to achieve than to convince the American people that the Income Tax is illegal. It’s been all-too-easy for the American people to write-off tax protest movements as kooky or fringe.
On the other hand, the American people have shown they’ll support a radical change if it’s actually offered to them. With precious little positive publicity and every prominent politician and newspaper taking a stand against repeal, the Small Government Initiative (2002) in liberal Massachusetts got 45% of the vote for repealing the state income tax.
The reason there is no current public support for repealing the federal income tax is because no organization is focused on making it happen. Instead, activists who would gladly see the end of the income tax are busy supporting puny tax cuts, a flat tax that will never remain flat, or some other, more complicated scheme.
I believe someone should be pointing out the huge personal benefits of repealing the income tax.
In addition, I believe that someone should be pointing out the tremendous harm that taxpayer money buys and developing ways to change the perverted incentives of our current system where government is going to grow each and every year, guaranteed. I am working full-time on the second part of that project (which is to say, I’m taking my own advice) because I believe if everyone understood just how bad Big Government really hurts all of us, there would be much less support for retaining the income tax.
Why Tax Evasion Fails as a Freedom Strategy
You see, by trying to focus on legalisms, tax evasion prophets don’t demonstrate that government shouldn’t be taxing your income. People have been duped, by schools, the mainstream media, etc., into believing that they’re doing their patriotic duty by paying taxes — that the programs of the State are necessary, perhaps even good. They’re not. Government uses your tax dollars to hurt you, your family, and your community.
Even worse, this movement sacrifices freedom activists on the altar of big government. We’ve heard of marriages destroyed, prison sentences served, and massive confiscation of possessions – all in fights with the IRS. It’s not a news flash to say that the IRS operates in an unconstitutional fashion. But it seems like almost no one realizes that as long as government is as big as it is, there will always be such a Gestapo-like agency.
I want to be clear: It’s your right to fight back by not filing or paying your income tax. Gandhi himself might approve.
And after reading this article, you may still believe it’s a worthwhile strategy to win back our freedom. If so, then we’d ask you to acknowledge that there’s more than one way to approach this subject.
I honestly believe my efforts have little or nothing to offer that would add to the efforts of folks like, just for example, Bob Schulz. But if you still believe that the taxes are illegal, perhaps you’ll see how the Downsize DC approach complements — the same way a knife complements a fork. You wouldn’t want to have two of the same implements at the dinner table, and you shouldn’t hope for duplication here. If you don’t, I don’t want to bicker with you. But to anyone with an open mind, I say . . .
I want to mass market the damage government does with tax dollars. I want to open hearts and minds. Many who would consider my message would be close-minded to a tax protester’s method.
I think the evidence is clear: Nearly all successful politicians are panderers, not leaders. But that can be worked to our advantage! If sufficient demand was created to end destructive, un-Constitutional programs and boondoggles, then some opportunistic politicians would surely respond. It is up to us to create that sufficient demand.
My group, DownsizeDC.org, will set out to build such a constituency through word of mouth, direct marketing, and advertising. We are already using the Internet in dramatic fashion to consolidate our crusade.
Campaigns to repeal the income tax and campaigns to reduce government (like DownsizeDC.org) to its constitutional functions will give thousands of people the realization that big government is not only unnecessary, but also harmful. The result should be thousands of new DC Downsizers.
The result of tax evasion campaigns will be thousands of new federal prisoners and perhaps a few new freedom activists. To me, the choice is obvious.
But I ask you: Don’t you want more people to agree with us – to know what we know and to understand what we understand? Don’t we want to swell the ranks of those who will join us in the fight for smaller government?
If so, you’ll want to support a mass-marketing, educational campaign like DownsizeDC.org – even if you believe you don’t have to pay the income tax.
Filed in The Bureau
I’m sure you’ll get plenty of misspelled, over-capitalized, crayon-written rants from income tax protestor nuts. You should post them.
I’ve been living in New Hampshire for a little over a year now. This year was the first time I filed my taxes while living here. We don’t have a state income tax, and I literally didn’t have to file a thing with the state, only Federal. I’m so used to filing income taxes with both the state and Federal government that it was actually a really scary feeling at first. I kept feeling like there was something I was getting wrong; something I wasn’t understanding; and that I would get in trouble.
Man I love living here. No state income tax. No sales tax. I really hope that doesn’t change.
Also, speaking of tax evasion, I’m not sure if you’re aware of the case of Ed and Elaine Brown, since you’re in D.C. It was a huge deal up here. There was a big standoff, and they finally went to prison along with some of their supporters. These people were completely nuts, the kind of people that espoused the misguided theories you discussed. They were armed to the teeth in order to hold the feds at bay. Frankly, I wasn’t sad to see them go. They weren’t rational protesters, they and their followers were on the lunatic fringe. But they were definitely a very high profile example of what can happen from people that very vocally insist that a Federal income tax is illegal and voluntary. They could not have possibly advertised the fact that they refused to pay taxes louder if they tried.
I would never be glad to see someone go to prison for tax evasion, especially when we have so many criminals in our government running around free. Forcing someone to pay taxes is a violation of their natural rights. Paying taxes should be voluntary.
Dear Jim:
Your article is well written— it does have some flaws, and erroneous
fundamentals which causes one to wonder why you have only studied a minimum amount of Supreme court material– if any.
One of my basic questions to you is - Have you ever heard of
Chuck Conces, head of the lawman??? Have you ever read his extensive legal research?? I don’t think you understand that our sweet government is not going to yield to your way of thinking– just exam all of the present laws they are passing to controll our lives. Did you ever read the results of Attorney Tom Cryers case?? Did you read the transcripts of ex-irs
agent Joe Bannister’s case?? Both found not guilty– Why not?? Read their cases. I wonder about you Jim– you sound like a plant to me?! or someone who lives in the IvoryTower– Jim - you will never outgrow warfare, you simply must learn to fight- Best regards, Arnie
You are tagging people who merely want the income tax properly applied to those who are liable , as tax protestors. That is incorrect on your part. There is a law and there are people who are liable. Those are people/persons who have privileged income. Income not in the generic sense but as spelled out in the IRS code book. I hear people constantly claiming the 16th amendment was never ratified, that is true but has no bearing on the income tax as the supreme court ruled the 16th amendment gave congress no new taxing powers. Meaning they cannot apply a direct tax upon the people without apportionment and no excise tax can apply to ordinary (as in the generic sense)cash receipts which are not privileged income but available to any working man. The Bible cautions us to “See that ye be not decieved” and yet people continue to look past valid information and go there own way.
I agree with Steven, No one should relish seeing any person sent to prison by this beast system. It should be that the government clearly show where this man is incorrect so that he could understand why he was liable. Of course they could not show that or it would blow open the scam that has swindled so many millions out of their property.
Just to be clear, I’m not saying that the law does not require people to pay taxes. Unfortunately, it does. (I’m a CPA and am pretty familiar with the tax laws). What I am saying, however, it that the law is unjust and should be repealed. Then I would have to find a real job.
[...] However, if we really wanted to rein in the size of the government, putting a crimp in the cashflow is the way to do it. Like Jim Babka, I’m not advocating tax avoision. Ideally, I’d like to abolish the income tax — but is that feasible? Not until people realize the terrible tax burden they are already under. People are aware of the tax burden, at most, once a year. The major impediment to comprehending this burden is that we pay a relatively small amount with each paycheck instead of all at once. Consider how much cheaper a major appliance seems when you can space your payments out over a year or two. Paying your taxes during the course of a year hides the enormity of it all. Instead of focusing on getting a flat tax, or abolishing the income tax altogether, small-government proponents should change tax law so that people had to pay all at once. People would be far more willing to listen to tax cuts if they had to cut such a huge check all at once. Secondly, the IRS docking your pay every pay period changes the reality of the situation quite a bit: people don’t see the money being taken out as their money. Alternatively, a monstrous check out of your bank account due on April 15th, the point would be driven home: It’s your money, not the government’s. [...]