<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Sacred Texts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.positiveliberty.com/2007/09/on-sacred-texts.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.positiveliberty.com/2007/09/on-sacred-texts.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Positive Liberty &#187; Siris on Sacred Texts</title>
		<link>http://www.positiveliberty.com/2007/09/on-sacred-texts.html#comment-402729</link>
		<dc:creator>Positive Liberty &#187; Siris on Sacred Texts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 10:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positiveliberty.com/2007/09/on-sacred-texts.html#comment-402729</guid>
		<description>[...] A rejoinder to my post on sacred texts. Commentary below the fold. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A rejoinder to my post on sacred texts. Commentary below the fold. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pseudo-Polymath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Morning Highlights</title>
		<link>http://www.positiveliberty.com/2007/09/on-sacred-texts.html#comment-399472</link>
		<dc:creator>Pseudo-Polymath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Morning Highlights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positiveliberty.com/2007/09/on-sacred-texts.html#comment-399472</guid>
		<description>[...] Post (Positive Liberty) and rebut (Siris). Reply? Rejoinder? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post (Positive Liberty) and rebut (Siris). Reply? Rejoinder? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Oson</title>
		<link>http://www.positiveliberty.com/2007/09/on-sacred-texts.html#comment-399121</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Oson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positiveliberty.com/2007/09/on-sacred-texts.html#comment-399121</guid>
		<description>Jason,
I think when you state (without reference or supporting evidence) that:

&lt;em&gt;Second, the difference between a sacred text and other texts is very simple. A sacred text commands obedience. An ordinary text must stand or fall on its own merits, but a sacred text is never thought capable of error.&lt;/em&gt; 

You are wrong. The words "Sacred" and "Holy" are not synonymous with "obey" and for good reason. Holy means set aside for God. Sacred is similar. 

A sacred text demands our respect, to be taken seriously. 

However, I think &lt;a href="http://branemrys.blogspot.com/2007/09/sacred-texts.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Brandon&lt;/a&gt; has a better dissection than I might provide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,<br />
I think when you state (without reference or supporting evidence) that:</p>
<p><em>Second, the difference between a sacred text and other texts is very simple. A sacred text commands obedience. An ordinary text must stand or fall on its own merits, but a sacred text is never thought capable of error.</em> </p>
<p>You are wrong. The words &#8220;Sacred&#8221; and &#8220;Holy&#8221; are not synonymous with &#8220;obey&#8221; and for good reason. Holy means set aside for God. Sacred is similar. </p>
<p>A sacred text demands our respect, to be taken seriously. </p>
<p>However, I think <a href="http://branemrys.blogspot.com/2007/09/sacred-texts.html" rel="nofollow">Brandon</a> has a better dissection than I might provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philosophy, et cetera</title>
		<link>http://www.positiveliberty.com/2007/09/on-sacred-texts.html#comment-398096</link>
		<dc:creator>Philosophy, et cetera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positiveliberty.com/2007/09/on-sacred-texts.html#comment-398096</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Literalism and Automatic Interpretation...&lt;/strong&gt;

It is tempting to claim that a literal interpretation is somehow the most 'natural', or the 'default' option. But I think this is simply because it comes most easily to us literal-minded folk......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Literalism and Automatic Interpretation&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It is tempting to claim that a literal interpretation is somehow the most &#8216;natural&#8217;, or the &#8216;default&#8217; option. But I think this is simply because it comes most easily to us literal-minded folk&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
